Research methods are qualitative or quantitative tools for acquiring and analysing material. Resources for methodology learning have also been compiled on .
(in Finnish) is the 's freely accessible learning environment for quantitative and qualitative research methods in the social and behavioural sciences.
includes a quantitative research method learning environment open for all. Administrator and provider: (Currently available only in Finnish).
includes a qualitative research method learning environment open for all. Administrator and provider: (Currently available only in Finnish).
(currently only in Finnish) is a guide for choosing research methods in a research process, compiled by the University of Jyv盲skyl盲's Faculty of Humanities. Includes a Mapping Research Methods section with terminology in English. Suitable also for other fields of science. The links in the guide direct you to the collections of the University of Jyv盲skyl盲, and therefore you need to check the availability of literature separately from .
contains method literature, full text reference books and articles, research examples and video material. The material is available for the 91天美 staff and students.
Covidence is an online tool that can assist with the screening of citations, abstracts and full text studies for systematic and other complex reviews. It also supports risk of bias assessment, data extraction and the exporting of data and reference information in CSV format or to Excel.
91天美 (UEF) students and staff have access to Covidence.
- If you have not yet signed up to Covidence with your UEF (@uef.fi / @student.uef.fi) email address you need to(and more).
- If you already have an user account associated with your UEF university email address, go to the , select Sign in with SSO (Single-Sign-On) and enter your UEF email address.
Need some help getting started?
More information: information.services@uef.fi
Before writing a systematic review or other similar review, it is a good idea to register the review protocol before starting work. Registering a protocol helps to improve transparency and reduces duplication of work. Many journal publishers now require a registered protocol.
General guidance is available in the .
Various registration platforms:
- (only systematic reviews)
- (only systematic reviews)
- (systematic reviews, meta-analyses)
- (systematic reviews, scoping-reviews)
- (all study designs)
- (all study designs)
- (all study designs)
- (all study designs)
See also:
- Pieper, D., Rombey, T. Where to prospectively register a systematic review. Syst Rev 11, 8 (2022). ; ()
(previously known as What Review is Right for You?)